Nisha @ Heena & Anr. v. State of Haryana & Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
In a habeas corpus petition, minors claiming a love marriage sought protection from family members due to apprehension of danger. The Court, without expressing an opinion on marriage age or validity, partly accepted the plea, directing respondent police to protect the petitioners against family interference.
What did the court decide?
Respondent Nos.2 and 3 directed to protect lives and liberty of petitioners; respondent Nos.4 to 11 restrained from interfering with their peaceful living.