The petitioner was absent. The writ petition was disposed of as the petitioner had been allowed to withdraw it by this Court at the Supreme Court's instance to pursue SARFAESI Act proceedings.
disposed of the writ petition in conformity with the Supreme Court's order allowing withdrawal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
::1::
CWP No.11929 of 2007 (O & M)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No.11929 of 2007 (O & M) Date of Decision: October 15, 2012
Pardeep Verma
....Petitioner
Versus
UCO Bank and another
.... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SANDHAWALIA
Present: None for the petitioner.
Mr. Sanjiv Gupta (KKR), Advocate, for the respondents-UCO Bank.
AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J.
The challenge in this writ petition is to notice dated 25th July, 2007 (Anneuxre P-3) issued by respondent-Bank.
CWP No.11929 of 2007 (O & M) ::2::
the petitioner and ordered that the petitioner was allowed to withdraw the
petition which was pending before this Court.
accordingly.
(AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) JUDGE
(G.S. SANDHAWALIA) JUDGE
October 15, 2012 Sukhpreet
Pardeep Verma
UCO Bank
AJAY KUMAR MITTAL
G.S. SANDHAWALIA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
