The High Court disposed of a CWP regarding unpaid labour bills for paddy loading. It directed the State to decide on a representation within three months and release eligible amounts within four weeks.
Direction to respondent to decide on representation within three months and release eligible dues within four weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
::1::
CWP No.11353 of 2011 (O & M)
IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No.11353 of 2011 (O & M) Date of Decision: February 13, 2012.
Vijay Kumar
....Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab and others
.... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL
Present: None for the petitioner.
Mr. Jaswinder Singh, DAG, Punjab.
AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J.
The petitioner has approached this Court by way of the present petition filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus or directions to respondent No.2 to release the amount due to the petitioner against his labour bills for the purposes of loading and carriage of paddy for the crop years 2009-10.
::2::
CWP No.11353 of 2011 (O & M)
24.04.2010 (Annexure P-5) is alleged to have been submitted, but no decision was being taken thereon.
(AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) JUDGE
February 13, 2012 sukhpreet
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the State is directed to release the amount due to the petitioner for labour bills within the stipulated time.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Vijay Kumar
State of Punjab
Ajay Kumar Mittal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
