The petitioner sought a writ for demarcation that was un-traced for five months. The Court held the writ was not appropriate and directed the petitioner to pursue the matter before relevant authorities.
Null. Petitioner directed to approach concerned authorities.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Civil Writ Petition No.10521 of 2012 Date of Decision: July 24, 2012
Shamsher Singh
...Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab & others
...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH
Present: Mr.Sukhwinder S.Kainth, Advocate,
for the petitioner.
RANJIT SINGH, J.
The petitioner has approached this court with a prayer that his request for demarcation has remained un-traced for five months.
Writ is not appropriate remedy. The petitioner may pursue his remedy before the authorities concerned to get the demarcation done.
Dismissed.
July 24, 2012 ( RANJIT SINGH ) ramesh JUDGE
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a writ is an appropriate remedy for the petitioner's request for demarcation when it remained un-traced for five months.
Shamsher Singh
State of Punjab
Ranjit Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
