The High Court disposed of a writ petition by holding it infructuous after the petitioner's release, noting the alleged detenue was not in illegal custody and affidavits had been filed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRWP No.29 of 2013 Date of decision: 15.01.2013
Jasvir Kaur
....Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab and others
....Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARAMJEET SINGH
Present: - Mr. Manjit Singh Uppal, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Gurinderjit Singh, DAG, Punjab.
PARAMJEET SINGH, J. (ORAL)
Affidavits on behalf of respondents No.1 to 4, filed in Court
today, are taken on record.
Learned counsel for the State states that alleged detenue Kulwinder Singh @ Niku was not in the illegal custody and even the report of the Warrant Officer states so.
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner has already been released.
In view of this, this petition has been rendered infructuous. Dismissed as infructuous.
(Paramjeet Singh) Judge
January 15, 2012 R.S.
Jasvir Kaur
State of Punjab
PARAMJEET SINGH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
