Manoj Kumar v. State of Punjab
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner present personally. Court refers parties to oral judgment of equal date passed in CRA No.123-SB of 2003 titled Tara Chand vs State of Punjab. No substantive decision recorded in this text.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRR No.1382 of 2000
Date of decision : 06.08.2012
Manoj Kumar
...Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab and others
...Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA CHAUHAN
Present: None for the petitioner.
Mr. Amit Chaudhary, DAG, Punjab.
Mr. APS Mann, Advocate.
JITENDRA CHAUHAN, J. (Oral)
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Outcome of related civil warrant case on pension issue.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Manoj Kumar
- respondent
State of Punjab
Coram
Jitendra Chauhan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Punjab & Haryana HC
- Decided on
- · July
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRR/1382/2000
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court