The petitioner filed a petition for regular bail under Section 439 CrPC. The counsel for the petitioner requested withdrawal of the petition with liberty to approach the Sessions Court after recording of evidence. The petition was dismissed as withdrawn with the specified liberty.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Crl. Misc. No. M- 9052 of 2012(O&M) Date of Decision: May 2, 2012.
Nafe Singh.
...... PETITIONER(s)
Versus
State of Haryana.
...... RESPONDENT (s)
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA
Present: Mr. Vikram Chaudhri, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Anmol Malik, AAG, Haryana.
Mr. Sanjay Vashisth, Advocate, for the complainant.
RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral)
The present petition has been filed for regular bail under Section 439 of Code of Criminal Procedure in FIR no.115 dated 19.11.2011, under Section 304 and Section 27 of Arms Act, 1959, registered at police station Baund Kalan, District Bhiwani.
Learned counsel for the petitioner requests for withdrawal of this petition with liberty to move court of Sessions after recording of evidence of main witnesses.
Dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.
( RAM CHAND GUPTA ) JUDGE
May 2, 2012. ‘om’
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Nafe Singh
State of Haryana
Ram Chand Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
