Oral order dismissing a bail petition under Section 439 CrPC as it was rendered infructuous because the petitioners had already been granted bail by the trial court. The matter was also described as withdrawn by the counsel.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn and rendered infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Crl. Misc. No. M- 7012 of 2012(O&M) Date of Decision: May 2, 2012.
Pawan and another.
...... PETITIONER(s)
Versus
U.T., Chandigarh.
...... RESPONDENT (s)
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA
Present: Mr. R.S.Rana, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Preetpal Singh Guliani, APP, UT.
RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral)
The present petition has been filed for regular bail under Section 439 of Code of Criminal Procedure in FIR no.385 dated 16.10.2011, under Sections 419/420/120B, registered at police station Sector 39, Chandigarh.
It has been stated by learned counsel for the petitioners that they have been granted bail by learned trial Court and hence, the present petition has become infructuous.
Dismissed as withdrawn as rendered infructuous.
( RAM CHAND GUPTA ) May 2, 2012. JUDGE ‘om’
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Pawan and another
U.T., Chandigarh
RAM CHAND GUPTA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
