In a regular bail petition under Section 439 Cr.P.C., the petitioner requested withdrawal of the application. The High Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
Crl.M.No.M-7155 of 2012(O&M) Date of Decision: March 20, 2012
Kanchan Singh @ Kanchan Kumar
.....Petitioner
v.
The State of Haryana
.....Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA
Present: Mr.B.S.Saroha, Advocate for Mr.Rahul Vats, Advocate for the petitioner.
.....
RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral)
Crl.M.No.15095 of 2012
Application is allowed subject to all just exceptions.
Crl.M.No.M-7155 of 2012
The present petition filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.825, dated 24.10.2011, under Sections 324, 452 and 307 IPC, registered at Police Station City Sirsa, (Haryana).
Learned counsel for the petitioner requests for withdrawal of this petition.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
20.3.2012
meenu
(Ram Chand Gupta) Judge
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to grant regular bail to the petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Kanchan Singh @ Kanchan Kumar
The State of Haryana
RAM CHAND GUPTA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
