The High Court declined leave to appeal against the acquittal of accused respondents under Section 378(4) CrPC, holding the trial court's judgment was well-reasoned and free from illegality or perversity.
Leave to appeal under Section 378(4) CrPC was declined; appeal dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CRM-A No.701-MA of 2011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-A No.701-MA of 2011
Date of decision : 29.08.2012
Sukhdev Raj
...Applicant-appellant
Versus
Des Raj and others
...Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA CHAUHAN
Present: Mr. R.S. Bajaj, Advocate, for the applicant.
JITENDRA CHAUHAN, J. (Oral)
CRM-A No.701-MA of 2011
from doing so, the accused got furious. They abused and manhandled him. He was rescued by Kashmir Singh, PW2, and Sukhdev Raj, PW3. It attracted the public on the spot. On seeing the public, the accused fled from the spot.
CRM-A No.701-MA of 2011
judgment passed by the learned trial Court does not suffer from any illegality or perversity.
29.08.2012
atulsethi
(JITENDRA CHAUHAN) JUDGE
2 issues framed by the court
Whether leave to appeal should be granted against the acquittal of accused respondents.
Whether the trial court's judgment suffers from any illegality or perversity.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sukhdev Raj
Des Raj
Jitendra Chauhan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
