Petition granted anticipatory bail. Petition convicted as infructuous in presence of affidavit stating no apprehension of threat. Judgment disposed summarily.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Criminal Misc. No. M-4336 of 2012 Date of decision: 04.07.2012.
Partima Ahlawat and another
..Petitioners
Versus
The State of Haryana and others
..Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY
Present: None for the petitioners.
Mr. S.S. Nara, Sr. DAG, Haryana, for respondents No.1 to 3 – State. None for respondents No.4 and 5.
Daya Chaudhary, J. (Oral)
Learned State counsel submits that the petitioners have submitted their affidavits stating that they are not apprehending any threat at this stage and are not in need of any security.
In view of the statement made by learned State counsel,
no further direction is required to be issued and the present petition has become infructuous.
Dismissed as infructuous.
(DAYA CHAUDHARY) JUDGE
04.07.2012 neetu
Partima Ahlawat
The State of Haryana
Daya Chaudhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
