Dismissed
Deepika etc. v. State of Haryana etc.
Punjab & Haryana HCCRM-M/2391/2012
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
What the court decided
AI extract
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Criminal Misc. No. M-2391 of 2012 (O&M) Date of decision: 03.07.2012.
Deepika and another
..Petitioners
Versus
State of Haryana and others
..Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY
Present: None for the petitioners.
Mr. S.S. Nara, Sr. DAG, Haryana, for respondents No.1 to 3 – State.
None for respondent No.4.
Daya Chaudhary, J. (Oral)
Learned State counsel on the basis of reply submits that the statements of private respondents were recorded and it has been mentioned that they have no objection with regard to the marriage of the petitioners and they will not disturb the life of the petitioners.
In view of the statements made by learned State counsel and the stand taken in the statements, no further direction is required to be issued and the petition has become infructuous.
Dismissed as infructuous.
03.07.2012 (DAYA CHAUDHARY) neetu JUDGE
Deepika and another
State of Haryana and others
Daya Chaudhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court