Petitioners withdrew their criminal miscellaneous petition. The court allowed withdrawal with liberty to approach authorities for grievance redressal.
None; petition dismissed allowing freedom to approach authorities.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Crl.Misc.No.M-409 of 2012 (O&M) Date of decision:04.01.2012
Sunder Pal Singh Sandhu and another
....Petitioners
Versus
State of Punjab and others
....Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG
Present: Mr. Navneet Singh, Advocate for the petitioners.
RAKESH KUMAR GARG, J (ORAL)
After arguing for sometime, counsel for the petitioners
wishes to withdraw the instant petition.
Ordered accordingly.
However, the petitioners are at liberty to approach the
authorities concerned for redressal of their grievance, if any.
January 04, 2012 (RAKESH KUMAR GARG) savita JUDGE
Sunder Pal Singh Sandhu
State of Punjab
Rakesh Kumar Garg
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
