A petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking directions to protect the life and liberty of petitioners and restrain respondents from interfering in their personal lives wasdisposedof by directing respondent No.2 tolookinto the grievancesand take appropriate measures if necessary.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Crl. M. No.404-M of 2012 Date of Decision:5.1.2012
Ranjit Singh and another
.... Petitioners
Versus
State of Punjab and others
.... Respondents
CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur
Present: Mr. B.S. Baath, Advocate for the petitioners.
1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2.To be referred to the Reporters or not?
3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?
NIRMALJIT KAUR, J.(Oral)
This is a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for issuance of directions to respondents No.1 to 3 to protect the lives and liberty of the petitioners and also directing respondents No.4 to 7 not to interfere in the personal lives of the petitioners.
The petitioners along with their counsel are present in the Court.
Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 to look into the grievances of the petitioners and if found necessary, take appropriate measures in accordance with law.
5.1.2012 rajeev
( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) JUDGE
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for protection of life and liberty should be allowed by directing the State to look into the petitioners' grievances.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ranjit Singh
another
State of Punjab
others
Nirmaljit Kaur
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
