Allowed

Daljeet Singh @ Jagjeet Singh & Ors. v. State of Punjab & Anr.

Punjab & Haryana HC4 Jan 2012CRM-M/22690/2011

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petition to quash an FIR under Sections 363/366/120-B IPC based on a genuine compromise. The High Court allowed the petition, invoking inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash the FIR and subsequent proceedings in the interest of justice.

What did the court decide?

FIR No.48 dated 4.6.2011 registered under Sections 363/366/120-B IPC and subsequent proceedings arising therefrom were quashed.

Daljeet Singh @ Jagjeet Singh & Ors. Vs State of Punjab… — Corruption | Punjab & Haryana HC (2012)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶2

CRM M-22690 of 2011 Date of Decision:4.1.2012

¶3

Daljeet Singh @ Jagjeet Singh and others

¶4

.... Petitioners

¶5

Versus

¶6

State of Punjab and another

¶7

.... Respondents

¶8

CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur

¶9

Present: Mr. Peeush Gagneja, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Kirat Singh Sidhu, D.A.G. Punjab. Mr. Vinod Khunger, Advocate for respondent No.2.

¶10

¶11

1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment?

¶12

2.To be referred to the Reporters or not?

¶13

3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

¶14

NIRMALJIT KAUR, J.(Oral)

¶15

The instant petition has been filed for quashing of FIR No.48 dated 4.6.2011 registered under Sections 363/366/120-B IPC Police Station Khuian Sarwar, Distrit Ferozepur and subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise entered into between the parties.

¶16

The FIR in question was got registered by respondent No.2Dhan Raj. The matter has since been compromised. Compromise deed (Annexure P-2) has also been placed on record in this regard.

¶17

Vide order dated 3.10.2011, the parties were directed to appear before the Illaqa Magistrate on 8.11.2011. The said Court was further directed to record the statements of the parties and verify the genuineness of the compromise and submit its report to this Court.

¶18

In pursuance to the same, report of the Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Abohar, has been received. As per the said report, the statements of the parties have been recorded. It is further submitted that as per their statements, the Court is satisfied that the compromise arrived at between the parties is genuine one and without any pressure or coercion.

¶19

The Full Bench of this Court, in the case of Kulwinder Singh and others v. State of Punjab and another 2007(3) RCR (Criminal) 1052

¶20

CRM M-22690 of 2011

¶21

-2-

¶22

has held that the compromise, in a modern society, is the sine qua non of harmony and orderly behaviour. It is the soul of justice and if the power under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. is used to enhance such a compromise which, in turn, enhances the social amity and reduces friction, then it truly is “finest hour of justice”. Disputes which have their genesis not only in matrimonial discord but others as well, such compromise deserves to be accepted. It is further held as under:-

¶23

“ The only inevitable conclusion from the above discussion is that there is no statutory bar under the Cr.P.C. which can affect the inherent power of this Court under Section 482. Further, the same cannot be limited to matrimonial cases alone and the Court has the wide power to quash the proceedings even in noncompoundable offences notwithstanding the bar under Section 320 of the Cr.P.C in order to prevent the abuse of law and to secure the ends of justice.”

¶24

In the case of Madan Mohan Abbot v. State of Punjab 2008 (4) S.C. Cases 582, the Apex Court emphasised and advised as under:-

¶25

“ We need to emphasise that it is perhaps advisable that in disputes where the question involved is of a purely personal nature, the court should ordinarily accept the terms of the compromise even in criminal proceedings as keeping the matter alive with no possibility of a result in favour of the prosecution is a luxury which the courts, grossly overburdened as they are, cannot afford and that the time so saved can be utilised in deciding more effective and meaningful litigation. This is a common sense approach to the matter based on ground of realities and bereft of the technicalities of the law.”

¶26

In view of the settled position of law and in the facts of the present case, it is a fit case where there is no impediment in the way of the Court to accept the compromise and exercise its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of FIR in the interest of justice to promote peace and harmony. The compromise is entered into without any pressure.

¶27

CRM M-22690 of 2011

¶28

-3-

¶29

Accordingly, the instant petition is allowed and FIR No.48 dated 4.6.2011 registered under Sections 363/366/120-B IPC Police Station Khuian Sarwar, Distrit Ferozepur and subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise entered into between the parties are hereby quashed in the interest of justice.

¶30

4.1.2012 rajeev

¶31

( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) JUDGE

Daljeet Singh @ Jagjeet Singh & Ors. v. State of Punjab & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Daljeet Singh @ Jagjeet Singh & Ors. v. State of Punjab & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Naveen & Ors. Vs State of Haryana& Anr.

Sukhdev Singh Vs State of Punjab

Hardev Sngh & Ors. Vs State of Punjab & Anr.

Aridaman & Ors. Vs State of Punjab & Anr.

Asha Rani & Anr. Vs State of Punjab & Ors.

Jaspreet Kaur Dosanjh and Another Vs State of Punjab and Others