The High Court of Punjab & Haryana dismissed the petition under Section 482 CrPC as withdrawn by the petitioner, allowing her to raise arguments later at the trial stage.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to raise points at trial.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Crl. Misc. No. M-38002 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision : 19.01.2012
Dr. Daisy Sood
...Petitioner
Versus
Joginder Singh
...Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR
Present: Mr. Brijeshwar Singh Bhalla, Advocate for the petitioner.
Nemo for the respondent.
M ehinder S ingh S ullar, J. (Oral)
After arguing the matter for quite some length, when this Court was not inclined to exercise jurisdiction under Section 482 for quashing the FIR, learned counsel intends to withdraw the present petition to enable the petitioner to raise/urge all the points taken therein at the appropriate stage of the trial before the
trial Court.
Dismissed as withdrawn, with the aforesaid liberty, as prayed for.
January 19, 2012 naresh.k
( M ehinder S ingh S ullar ) Judge
1 issue framed by the court
whether the Crown Court permission application under Section 482 of the CrPC should be dismissed as withdrawn to allow raising points at the trial stage.
Dr. Daisy Sood
Joginder Singh
Mehinder Singh Sullar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
