The High Court dismissed the criminal miscellaneous petition when the petitioners withdrew it to save points for trial before the trial court, granting liberty as prayed.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to take points at trial.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Crl. Misc. No. M-31384 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision : 18.01.2012
Karan Syal and another
...Petitioners
Versus
Rosy Kesar
...Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR
Present: Mr. Gautam Dutt, Advocate for the petitioners.
Nemo for the respondent.
M ehinder S ingh S ullar, J. (Oral)
At the very outset, learned counsel intends to withdraw the present petition to enable the petitioners to take/urge all the points contained therein at the appropriate stage of trial before the trial Court.
Dismissed as withdrawn, with the aforesaid liberty, as prayed for.
January 18, 2012 naresh.k
( M ehinder S ingh S ullar ) Judge
Karan Syal and another
Rosy Kesar
Mehinder Singh Sullar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
