Inderjit Singh v. State of Punjab
Case brief
What is this about?
Petition held infructuous as petitioner was already acquitted by the trial Court. Petition dismissed.
What did the court decide?
Petition dismissed as having become infructuous.
Petition held infructuous as petitioner was already acquitted by the trial Court. Petition dismissed.
Petition dismissed as having become infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Criminal Misc. M 36183 of 2009 (O&M) Date of decision: 16.04.2012
Inderjit Singh
........ Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab and another .......Respondent(s)
Coram: Hon'ble Ms Justice Nirmaljit Kaur
-.-
Present: Mr.Atul Goyal, Advocate for Mr. Sandeep K Wadhawan, Advocate for the petitioners
Mr. K S Sidhu, DAG, Punjab
-.-
Nirmaljit Kaur, J. (Oral)
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners states that the
present petition is rendered infructuous as all the petitioners already stand acquitted by the trial Court.
Dismissed as having become infructuous.
(Nirmaljit Kaur) Judge
16.04.2012 mohan
Inderjit Singh
State of Punjab
Nirmaljit Kaur
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court