Disposed
Dayawati v. State of Haryana and Ors.
Punjab & Haryana HCCRM-M/3515/2011
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.…
What the court decided
AI extract
COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Crl. Misc. No. M-3515 of 2011 Date of decision : 04.05.2012
Dayawati
...Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana and others
..Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR
Present: Mr. Sunil Panwar, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Roopak Bansal, Addl. Advocate General, Haryana
for respondent No.1.
Nemo for respondent No.2.
Mr. S.K. Chauhan, Advocate for respondent No.3.
Mr. Tapan Kumar Yadav, Advocate for respondent Nos. 4 and 5.
M ehinder S ingh S ullar, J. (Oral)
At the very outset, learned counsel intends to withdraw the present
petition to enable the petitioner to avail her alternative remedy of revision.
Dismissed as withdrawn, with the aforesaid liberty, as prayed for.
Needless to mention that if the petitioner moves an application for
condonation of delay, then the same will be considered by the concerned Court sympathetically.
May 04, 2012 ( M ehinder S ingh S ullar ) naresh.k Judge
Dayawati
State of Haryana
Mehender Singh Sullar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court