Petitioner sought to withdraw the main petition to file a fresh one for quashing criminal prosecution post-compromise. The court dismissed the application as withdrawn with liberty.
Application dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file fresh petition
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Crl. Misc. No. M-33854 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision : 03.05.2012
Kamaljit Kaur
...Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab
..Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR
Present: Mr. Sanjay Kaushal, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Tejinder Singh Salana, D.A.G., Punjab for the respondent.
M ehinder S ingh S ullar, J. (Oral)
At the very outset, learned counsel intends to withdraw the main
petition to enable the petitioner to file fresh petition for quashing the impugned criminal prosecution, on the basis of compromise between the parties.
Dismissed as withdrawn, with the aforesaid liberty, as prayed for.
May 03, 2012 ( M ehinder S ingh S ullar ) naresh.k Judge
Kamaljit Kaur
State of Punjab
Mehender Singh Sullar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
