This is a criminal miscellaneous petition seeking bail. The single judge dismissed the petition holding that given the direct allegations against the petitioner, he was not a fit case for bail, and the effect of evidence must be considered by the trial Court.
Petition for bail dismissed; petitioner not a fit case for release.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Criminal Misc.-M No.33774 of 2012 (O&M) Date of Decision: November 01, 2012
Vikash @ Vicky
...Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana
...Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH
Present: Mr.Virender Singh, Advocate,
for the petitioner.
RANJIT SINGH, J.
In view of the direct allegations made against the petitioner, not a fit case for release on bail. The effect of evidence has to be considered by the trial Court.
Dismissed.
November 01, 2012 ( RANJIT SINGH ) ramesh JUDGE
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is a fit case for release on bail in view of direct allegations against him.
Vikash @ Vicky
State of Haryana
Ranjit Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
