This two-line oral order allowed the petition citing an even-date decision (CRM M-29034 of 2012) which quashed criminal proceedings arising from an FIR at Police Station Gidderbaha.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM M-32522 of 2012 (O&M) Date of Decision: December 01 , 2012
Surjit Singh and another
....Petitioners
Versus
State of Punjab and others
....Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARAMJEET SINGH
Present: - Mr. H.S. Saggu, Advocate, for Mr. G.S. Mann, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. Gurinderjit Singh, DAG, Punjab.
Ms. Sunita Chauhan, Advocate, for respondents No.2 to 4.
Paramjeet Singh, J. (Oral)
Allowed.
For reasons, see order of even date passed in CRM M-29034
of 2012 – Karnail Singh and others vs. State of Punjab and another. Cross case registered vide Rapat No. 29 dated 15.06.2012, under Sections 323, 324, 34 IPC as a cross case against FIR No. 68 dated 15.06.2012 along with Rapat No. 12 dated 19.06.2012, Police Station Gidderbaha, District Muktsar, and all the criminal proceedings arising therefrom are quashed.
December 01, 2012 [ Paramjeet Singh ] vkd Judge
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Karnail Singh and others vs. State of Punjab and anotherFollowed¶15
Karnail Singh and others vs. State of Punjab and another (CRM M-29034 of 2012)
Surjit Singh and another
State of Punjab and others
Paramjeet Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
