The petitioners prayed to withdraw the present criminal miscellaneous petition with liberty to file an afresh petition with better particulars, which was dismissed as withdrawn.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file afresh with better particulars.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh.
Crl.Misc.No.M-31965 of 2012 (O&M) Date of Decision:- 08.11.2012.
Pooja and another
Petitioners.
Versus
State of Punjab and others
Respondents.
CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE NARESH KUMAR SANGHI.
Present: - Mr.Rahul Bhargava, Advocate,
for the petitioners.
NARESH KUMAR SANGHI,J.
After arguing the case for some time, learned counsel for the petitioners prays for withdrawal of the
present petition with permission to file afresh with better particulars.
Dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid.
(NARESH KUMAR SANGHI) JUDGE
08.11.2012 Anoop
Pooja and another
State of Punjab and others
NARESH KUMAR SANGHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
