The High Court dismissed a quashing petition when the petitioner's counsel conceded that the matter should be disposed of in view of an earlier order passed by the same Court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Crl.Misc.No.M-316 of 2012 (O&M) Date of decision:09.01.2012
Kapil Jain
....Petitioner
Versus
Sushma
....Respondent
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG
Present: Mr. Sham Lal Bhalla, Advocate, for the petitioner.
RAKESH KUMAR GARG, J (ORAL)
After arguing for sometime, when this Court confronted the petitioner with the earlier order passed by this Court, counsel for the petitioner submitted that the instant quashing petition be dismissed.
Ordered accordingly.
savita
(RAKESH KUMAR GARG) JUDGE
January 09, 2012
Kapil Jain
Sushma
Rakesh Kumar Garg
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
