This criminal miscellaneous petition was dismissed as infructuous because the underlying complaint had been withdrawn. No substantive legal principles were laid down.
Petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Criminal Misc. No. M-30929 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision: 25.07.2012.
Shilpa Aggarwal
..Petitioner
Versus
Amandeep Singh
..Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY
Present: None for the petitioner.
Mr. G.S. Toor, Advocate, for the respondent.
Daya Chaudhary, J. (Oral)
Learned counsel for respondent No.2-complainant
submits that the present petition has become infructuous as the complaint has been withdrawn.
Dismissed as infructuous.
25.07.2012 neetu
(DAYA CHAUDHARY) JUDGE
Shilpa Aggarwal
Amandeep Singh
Daya Chaudhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
