Karamjit Kaur and Ors. v. State of Punjab
Case brief
What is this about?
Petition dismissed as infructuous on the submission that all accused had been acquitted by the trial court.
What did the court decide?
None; petition dismissed as infructuous.
Petition dismissed as infructuous on the submission that all accused had been acquitted by the trial court.
None; petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Crl. Misc. No. M-19075 of 2009
DATE OF DECISION: 24.07.2012
Karamjit Kaur and others
..........Petitioners
Versus
State of Punjab
..........Respondent
BEFORE:- HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY
Present:Mr. SS Rangi, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. R.S. Rawat, AAG, Punjab.
DAYA CHAUDHARY, J.
Learned counsel for the respondent-State on instructions from HC Surinder Dutt submits that all the accused have been acquitted of the charges by the trial Court and the present petition has become infructuous.
Dismissed as having become infructuous.
(DAYA CHAUDHARY) JUDGE
July 24, 2012 pooja
Karamjit Kaur and others
State of Punjab
Daya Chaudhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court