Petitioner sought bail under Section 439 CrPC for offenses under the NDPS Act. Counsel requested withdrawal of the petition, which was dismissed as withdrawn.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Crl. Misc. No. M- 30915 of 2011(O&M)
Date of Decision: May 9, 2012.
Vijay Kumar.
...... PETITIONER(s)
Versus
State of Haryana.
...... RESPONDENT (s)
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA
Present: Mr. Mandeep Kaushik, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Anmol Malik, AAG, Haryana.
RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral)
The present petition has been filed for regular bail under Section 439 of Code of Criminal Procedure in FIR no. 381, dated 27.05.2011, under Sections 17/18/27-A of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, registered at police station Sirsa, District Sirsa.
Learned counsel for the petitioner requests for withdrawal of this petition at this stage.
Dismissed as withdrawn at this stage.
( RAM CHAND GUPTA ) May 9, 2012. JUDGE ‘om’
Vijay Kumar
State of Haryana
Ram Chand Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
