This single-line order dismissed the criminal miscellaneous petition as infructuous, noting that bail had already been granted to the petitioners.
Petition dismissed as having become infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH
Crl. Misc. No. M-30876 of 2012(O&M) Date of Decision:. 12.12.2012
Amandeep Malik & Anr.
... Petitioners
vs.
State of U.T. Chandigarh
... Respondent
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJENDER SINGH MALIK
Present:Mr. Chirag Kundu, Advocate for the petitioners.
Ms. Kanta, Advocate for Mr. A.K. Lamdharia, Advocate for UT Chandigarh.
VIJENDER SINGH MALIK,J(ORAL)
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petition has become infructuous as bail has been granted to the petitioners under the provisions of section 167(2) Cr.P.C.
Dismissed as having become infructuous.
December 12,2012 ( VIJENDER SINGH MALIK ) Jiten JUDGE
Amandeep Malik & Anr.
State of U.T. Chandigarh
VIJENDER SINGH MALIK
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
