Petitioners filed a petition post-acquittal by the trial court. The court held the petition inadmissible as it became infructuous. The petition was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Criminal Misc. No. M-33172 of 2012 Date of decision:-11.12.2012
Vikaram and another
...Petitioners
Versus
State of Haryana
...Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARAMJEET SINGH
Present:Mr. Balraj Gujjar, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. Subhash Godara, Addl.A.G. Haryana.
PARAMJEET SINGH J.(Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have been acquitted by the trial court and hence the present petition has become infructuous.
Dismissed as having become infructuous.
December 11, 2012 ( PARAMJEET SINGH ) Vijay Asija JUDGE
Vijay Asija
Vikaram and another
State of Haryana
PARAMJEET SINGH
Vijay Asija
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
