This bail petition under Section 439 Cr.P.C. was allowed. The High Court, considering the petitioners had been in custody since August 30, 2012 in a complaint case, ordered their release on bail to the satisfaction of the concerned magistrate.
Grant of bail to the petitioners upon satisfaction of the Illaqa Magistrate/Duty Magistrate.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Crl. Misc. No. M-27963 of 2012 (O&M)
1
In the High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh
Crl. Misc. No. M-27963 of 2012 (O&M)
Date of decision: 2.11.2012
Parjeet and another ...Petitioners
Versus
State of Haryana and another .Respondents
Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice K.C.PURI Present: Mr. S.N.Gaur, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Amandeep Singh, AAG,Haryana for respondent No.1. Mr. Rajesh Gaur, Advocate for respondent No.2
K.C.Puri,J.(Oral)
This is a petition filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for grant of bail in a Criminal Complaint No.289/18.8.2009 titled “ Naveen vs. Hukam Chand etc . pending in the court of Ms. Monika Khanagwal, Judicial Magistrate, Faridabad in respect of offences under Sections 323, 324, 325, 307/34 IPC, Police Station Mujessar, District Faridabad
Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that in the police case petitioners are stated to have been allowed the concession of bail. It is a complaint case. Petitioners are stated to be in custody since 30.8.2012.
Crl. Misc. No. M-27963 of 2012 (O&M)
2
Application for grant of bail stands accepted and the petitioners Parjeet and Cheenu @ Gaurav are ordered to be released on bail to the satisfaction of Illaqa Magistrate/Duty Magistrate.
November 2,2012 (K.C.PURI) nk JUDGE
1 issue framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to the petitioners in the custodial case.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Parjeet and another
State of Haryana and another
K.C. Puri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
