The single-oral judgment held that the present petition was rendered infructuous based on a prior order. The matter was dismissed accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM NO. M-22145 OF 2012 (O&M) DECIDED ON : 01.11.2012
Inderjit Singh Gulati
...Petitioner
versus
State of Punjab and others
...Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. C. PURI
Present : Mr. Balpreet Singh, Advocate for Mr. M. S. Sachdev, Advocate, for the petitioner.
K. C. PURI, J. (ORAL)
In view of order passed in Crl. Misc. No. M-28199 of 2012 titled as, “ Harinderjit Singh vs. State of Punjab and another ”, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the present petition has become infructuous.
Dismissed as having been rendered infructous.
NOVEMBER 01 , 2012 (K. C. PURI) shalini JUDGE
Inderjit Singh Gulati
State of Punjab
K. C. PURI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
