State of Haryana v. Pirthi Singh
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court abated criminal proceedings upon the submission that the accused respondent had died.
What did the court decide?
Proceedings abated.
The High Court abated criminal proceedings upon the submission that the accused respondent had died.
Proceedings abated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Criminal Misc. No.252-MA of 2011 Date of decision: 27.07.2012.
State of Haryana
..Applicant
Versus
Pirthi Singh @ Prithvi Singh
..Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY
Present: Mr. S.S. Nara, Sr. DAG, Haryana, for the applicant – State.
None for the respondent.
Daya Chaudhary, J. (Oral)
Learned State counsel submits that the respondent has
expired on 08.03.2012 and the proceedings qua to the respondent be
abated.
In view of the submission made by learned State counsel,
proceedings qua to respondent stand abated.
27.07.2012 neetu
(DAYA CHAUDHARY) JUDGE
State of Haryana
Pirthi Singh @ Prithvi Singh
Daya Chaudhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court