Anil Punia v. State of Haryana
Case brief
What is this about?
M-18710 of 2012 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF…
M-18710 of 2012 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Criminal Misc. No. M-18710 of 2012
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Criminal Misc. No. M-18710 of 2012 Date of decision: 09.08.2012.
Anil Punia
..Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana
..Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY
Present: Mr. G.C. Shahpuri, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Anupam Sharma, A.A.G., Haryana, for the respondent – State.
Daya Chaudhary, J. (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that because of the order passed in Criminal Misc. No. M-17618 of 2012, the contention was wrongly recorded whereas it is a case of summoning as the petitioner was found innocent during investigation and was summoned on an application moved under Section 319 Cr.P.C. Learned counsel for the petitioner also submits that the petitioner is ready to join the Court proceedings.
In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the petitioner, in case, the petitioner surrender before the trial Court on or before 14.08.2012, he shall be released on interim bail on his furnishing bail bond and surety bond to the satisfaction of the trial Court.
Disposed of accordingly.
09.08.2012 (DAYA CHAUDHARY) neetu JUDGE
Anil Punia
State of Haryana
Daya Chaudhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court