Petitioner, facing charges under the NDPS Act, requested withdrawal of his bail petition; the High Court dismissed it as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
Crl.M.No.M-22820 of 2012(O&M) Date of Decision: August 2, 2012
Amarjit @ Jeeta
.....Petitioner
v.
State of Punjab
......Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA
Present: Mr.Amandeep Soni, Advocate for the petitioner.
......
RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral)
Crl.M.No.44082 of 2012
Application is allowed subject to all just exceptions.
Crl.M.No.M-22820 of 2012
The present petition filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is for grant of bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.46, dated 4.3.2012, under Section 22 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, registered at Police Station Bhargo Camp, District Jalandhar City.
After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner requests for withdrawal of this petition.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
2.8.2012
meenu
(Ram Chand Gupta) Judge
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Amarjit @ Jeeta
State of Punjab
Ram Chand Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
