Petitioners, who had previously been acquitted by a trial court on account of a compromise, filed a writ petition. The High Court dismissed the petition as infructuous since the complainant made no statement against them post-acquittal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM No.M-22750 of 2011 Date of decision:22.2.2012
Gurdeep Singh and another
...Petitioners
Versus
State of Punjab and another
...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE Ms. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI
Present: None for the petitioner.
Mr.Abhishek Chautala, AAG, Punjab.
None for respondent No.2.
RITU BAHRI, J. (Oral)
Learned counsel for the State, on instructions from ASI Narinder Singh, submits that the petitioners have since been acquitted by the trial court on 6.12.2011 on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties. He further submits that the complainant did not make any statement against the accused/petitioners.
In view of the above, the present petition is disposed of as infructuous.
(RITU BAHRI) JUDGE
22.2.2012 mks
Gurdeep Singh
another
State of Punjab
another
RITU BAHRI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
