Satpal Garg v. State of Haryana and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM NO. M-22724 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision : 26.11.2012
Satpal Garg
...Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana and another
...Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. C. PURI
Present : None for the petitioner.
Mr. Amandeep Singh, AAG Haryana.
K. C. PURI, J. (ORAL)
On the last date of hearing none has appeared on behalf of the petitioner. Today also, none appears inspite of repeated calls. Report has been received from the trial court that the parties have not appeared before the trial Court for compromise. This is a petition for quashing of FIR on the basis of compromise. In these circumstances, the present petition stands dismissed for want of prosecution.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Satpal Garg
- respondent
State of Haryana
Coram
K. C. PURI
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Punjab & Haryana HC
- Decided on
- · November
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRM-M/22724/2010
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court