Dismissed
Sadhana Khosla v. State of Punjab and Others
Punjab & Haryana HCCRM-M/21647/2012
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
What the court decided
AI extract
COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Crl.M.No. M- 21647 of 2012 (O&M) Date of decision : 26.11.2012
Sadhana Khosla
vs. State of Punjab and another
.................Respondents
Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice K.C. Puri
Present: Sh. G.P.S. Bal, Advocate for the petitioner
Sh.Sandeep Chhabra, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab.
Sh. Deepali Puri, Advocate for respondent No.2.
K.C. Puri, J.
Reply on behalf of respondent No.1 has been filed.
Vide order dated 23.7.2012, counsel for the petitioner had not pressed the petition for quashing the complaint. However, he submitted that proceedings under Sections 82 and 83 of Cr.P.C. have not been initiated in accordance with the law. Petitioner was allowed the concession of interim bail on his appearance before the trial Court and petitioner is stated to have appeared before the trial Court, in compliance to the said order. This is a private complaint.
So, the order dated 23.7.2012, passed by this Court is made absolute.
The petitioner may raise all the points, taken in the present petition, before the trial Court.
Disposed of. ( K.C. Puri ) 26.11.2012 Judge chugh
Sadhana Khosla
State of Punjab
Another
K.C. Puri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court