Petitioner sought withdrawal of the criminal miscellaneous petition; Court allowed the withdrawal and dismissed the petition.
Withdrew the petition; petition dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Crl. Misc. No. M-22135 of 2012 (O&M)
DATE OF DECISION: 26.07.2012
Rameshwar Dass
..........Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana
..........Respondent
BEFORE:- HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY
Present:Mr. Diwan S. Adlakha, Advocate for the petitioner.
DAYA CHAUDHARY, J.
After arguing the case at length, when the Court was not inclined to accept the contentions raised by learned counsel for the petitioner, he prays that he may be permitted to withdraw this petition.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
July 26, 2012 (DAYA CHAUDHARY) pooja JUDGE
Rameshwar Dass
State of Haryana
Daya Chaudhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
