The Criminal Miscellaneous petition was dismissed as withdrawn by the petitioner to avail an alternative remedy. The Court conditioned the dismissal by keeping the petitioner's prayer for liberty and noting that subsequent applications for condonation of delay would be sympathetically considered.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Crl. Misc. No. M-2135 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision : 21.05.2012
Mohan Singh
...Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab and another
..Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR
Present: Mr. Sarjit Singh, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Jagdev Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. C.S. Brar, D.A.G., Punjab for respondent No.1.
M ehinder S ingh S ullar, J. (Oral)
At the very outset, learned counsel intends to withdraw the present petition to enable the petitioner to avail his alternative remedy before the appropriate Court.
Dismissed as withdrawn, with the aforesaid liberty, as prayed for.
Needless to mention that if the petitioner files an application for condonation of delay, then the same will be considered by the concerned Court sympathetically.
May 21, 2012 ( M ehinder S ingh S ullar ) naresh.k Judge
Mohan Singh
State of Punjab
Mehinder Singh Sullar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
