Petitioner withdrew criminal miscellaneous petition with liberty to file fresh one. No substantive legal proposition established as the matter was disposed of without reasons.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Criminal Misc. No. M-21016 of 2012 (O&M) Date of decision: 23.07.2012.
Usha Rani
..Petitioner
Versus
S.K. Jain
..Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY
Present: Mr. Amit Kumar Jain, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Daya Chaudhary, J. (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner wants to withdraw this
petition with liberty to file fresh one with better particulars.
Dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty .
23.07.2012 neetu
(DAYA CHAUDHARY) JUDGE
Usha Rani
S.K. Jain
Daya Chaudhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
