The High Court of Punjab and Haryana disposed of a petition on the basis that respondents had no objection to the marriage and parties no longer had apprehended threat, requiring no further directions.
No further directions were required to be issued.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Crl. Misc. No. M-12165 of 2012
DATE OF DECISION: 20.07.2012
Krishan Bhardwaj and another
..........Petitioners
Versus
State of Punjab and others
..........Respondents
BEFORE:- HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY
Present:Ms. Deepika Kalia, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. G.S. Brar, AAG, Punjab.
Ms. Meenakshi, Advocate for Mr. R.S. Mamli, Advocate for respondents No. 6 to 9.
DAYA CHAUDHARY, J.
Learned counsel for respondents No.6 to 9 submits that respondents No.6 to 9 have no objection with the marriage of the petitioners.
Both the petitioners are present in Court and submit that now they are not apprehending any threat.
In view of the statement made by counsel for respondents No.6 to 9 as well as petitioners, no further directions are required to be issued.
Petition is disposed of accordingly.
(DAYA CHAUDHARY) JUDGE
July 20, 2012 pooja
Krishan Bhardwaj and another
State of Punjab and others
Daya Chaudhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
