The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed the criminal miscellaneous petition for want of prosecution as neither the petitioner nor her counsel appeared despite multiple hearing dates.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Criminal Misc. No.M-20937 of 2011 Date of Decision : November 19, 2012
Nachattar Kaur
...Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab & Others
...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARESH KUMAR SANGHI
Present: None for the petitioner.
Ms.Harsimrat Rai, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab, for respondent Nos.1 to 7.
Naresh Kumar Sanghi, J.
None has appeared for the petitioner. Even on the last dates of hearing i.e. 14.02.2012 and 16.07.2012, no one had put in appearance for the petitioner.
It appears that neither the petitioner nor her counsel is interested in pursuing the present petition.
Dismissed for want of prosecution.
November 19, 2012 (Naresh Kumar Sanghi) seema Judge
Nachattar Kaur
State of Punjab
Naresh Kumar Sanghi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
