This order declares a criminal miscellaneous petition infructuous because the JMIC, Rohtak accepted the prosecution's chargesheet. No legal principle is established.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM M 20625 of 2009 Date of decision: 02.02.2012
........ Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana and others .......Respondent(s)
Coram: Hon'ble Ms Justice Nirmaljit Kaur
-.-
Present: Mr. N R Dahia, Advocate for Mr. Jagat Singh, Advocate
for the petitioner
Mr. Anmol Malik, AAG, Haryana for the respondent State Mr. Rahul Garg, Advocate for respondents No. 2 to 5
-.-
Nirmaljit Kaur, J. (Oral)
Learned counsel for respondents No. 2 to 5 has placed on record the order dated 15.11.2010 passed by the JMIC, Rohtak, vide which, the cancellation report presented by the prosecution in the FIR in question has been accepted.
In view of the above, the present petition is rendered infructuous. However, the petitioner is always at liberty to challenge the same if so advised and in accordance with law.
Disposed of accordingly.
(Nirmaljit Kaur) Judge
02.02.2012 mohan
Mr. Jagat Singh
State of Haryana
respondents No. 2 to 5
Nirmaljit Kaur
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
