Dismissed
Dharambir and Ors. v. State of Haryana
Punjab & Haryana HCCRM-M/34577/2011
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
What the court decided
AI extract
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Crl. M. No.M-34577 of 2011 Date of Decision:1.2.2012
Dharam Veer and another
.... Petitioners
Versus
State of Haryana
.... Respondent
CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur
Present: Mr. K.S. Godara, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. J.S. Rattu, D.A.G. Haryana.
1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2.To be referred to the Reporters or not?
3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?
NIRMALJIT KAUR, J.(Oral)
The present petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of FIR No.290 dated 3.5.2010 under Sections 420,468,471,34 IPC Police Station, Sirsa, on the basis of compromise.
Learned counsel for the State has pointed out that the petitioners have compromised with the complainant. However, the complainant has not been made as a party in this case. Thus, the present petition is dismissed for non joinder of the necessary parties.
However, the petitioners are at liberty to file afresh by impleading complainant as party, if so advised.
1.2.2012 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to allow hearsay as part of the petition.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Dharam Veer
State of Haryana
Nirmaljit Kaur
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court