High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed a regular bail application filed by Satish Kumar, noting no new grounds were established after previous dismissals.
None; petition dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Crl. Misc. No. M-20242 of 2012 (O&M)
DATE OF DECISION: 30.07.2012
Satish Kumar
..........Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab
..........Respondent
BEFORE:- HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY
Present:Mr. B.S. Virk, Advocate for the petitioner.
DAYA CHAUDHARY, J.
Last two applications for grant of regular bail to the petitioner have been dismissed on 28.2.2012 and 8.5.2012. No new ground is made out to grant regular bail to the petitioner.
Petition is dismissed accordingly.
(DAYA CHAUDHARY) JUDGE
July 30, 2012 pooja
1 issue framed by the court
Whether regular bail should be granted to the petitioner considering previous dismissals without new grounds.
Satish Kumar
State of Punjab
Daya Chaudhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
