Petitioner sought withdrawal of criminal miscellaneous petition as prosecution evidence was recorded. Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn on 13.09.2012.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Crl. Misc. No. M-20021 of 2009 (O&M) Date of decision: 13.09.2012
Sewa Singh
....Petitioner
Versus
The State of Punjab and another
....Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARAMJEET SINGH
Present: - Mr. Vijay Rana, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. J.S. Bhullar, AAG, Punjab. Mr. R.K. Singla, Advocate, for respondent No.2.
PARAMJEET SINGH, J. (ORAL)
Crl. Misc. No.54619 of 2012
Allowed. Reply on behalf of respondent No.2 is taken on
record.
Crl. Misc. No. M-20021 of 2009
Learned counsel for the State states that the case is at the prosecution evidence and out of nine witnesses, four witnesses have already been examined.
In view of the above, learned counsel for the petitioner wants to withdraw this petition.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
(Paramjeet Singh) Judge
September 13, 2012 R.S.
Sewa Singh
The State of Punjab
Paramjeet Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
