The petition was dismissed as withdrawn. No substantive legal proposition is articulated in this order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM NO. M-18554 OF 2012 (O&M) DECIDED ON : 07.11.2012
Kavita and another
...Petitioners
versus
State of Haryana and others
...Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. C. PURI
Present : Mr. Surya Kant, Advocate for Mr. Ashok Kaushik, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Anupam Sharma, AAG, Haryana.
Mr. R. K. Dhiman, Advocate for Mr. M. K. Tewatia, Advocate, for respondent No.4.
K. C. PURI, J. (ORAL)
Learned counsel for the petitioner wishes to withdraw
the present petition.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
NOVEMBER 07, 2012 (K. C. PURI) shalini JUDGE
Kavita
State of Haryana
K. C. PURI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
