Dismissed
Vinay Sood v. State of Punjab & Anr.
Punjab & Haryana HCCRM-M/1830/2011
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Petitioner petition filed after acquittal by trial Court, deemed infructuous, dismissed.
What the court decided
AI extract
Petitioner petition filed after acquittal by trial Court, deemed infructuous, dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM M-1830 of 2011 Date of Decision:26.4.2012
Vinay Sood
.... Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab and another
.... Respondents
CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur
Present: Mr. Gourave Bhayyia, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Kirat Singh Sidhu, D.A.G. Punjab.
1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?
NIRMALJIT KAUR, J.(Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner has since been acquitted by the trial Court. Therefore, the present petition is rendered infructuous and the same may be dismissed as such.
Dismissed as having been rendered infructuous.
26.4.2012 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE
Vinay Sood
State of Punjab
Nirmaljit Kaur
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court