Supreem Singh v. State of Punjab
Case brief
What is this about?
The criminal miscellaneous petition was dismissed as it was withdrawn by the petitioner's counsel at this stage.
What did the court decide?
Petition dismissed.
The criminal miscellaneous petition was dismissed as it was withdrawn by the petitioner's counsel at this stage.
Petition dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Criminal Misc. No.M-18135 of 2012 Date of Decision : November 16, 2012
Supreem Singh
...Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab
...Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARESH KUMAR SANGHI
Present: Mr.R.K.Girdhar, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms.Harsimrat Rai, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab.
Naresh Kumar Sanghi, J.
Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal
of the present petition at this stage.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
November 16, 2012
seema
(Naresh Kumar Sanghi) Judge
Supreem Singh
State of Punjab
NARESH KUMAR SANGHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court