Petitioner withdrew a criminal revision petition following the framing of charges by the High Court, praying for liberty to approach alternative remedies. The Court disposed of the matter as withdrawn. No substantive legal principles were laid down.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to approach alternative remedies.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M No. 17595 of 2011 (O&M)
Date of Decision: November 15, 2012
Rajesh
…Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana and another
…Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NARESH KUMAR SANGHI
Present: Mr. Neeraj Kumar, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Shekhar Mudgal, AAG, Haryana, for respondent No. 1.
Mr. Sudhir Kumar Hooda, Advocate, for respondent No. 2.
NARESH KUMAR SANGHI, J.
Learned counsel for the State on instructions from HC Anil Kumar of Police Station, Sampla, District Rohtak, submits that the charges were framed on 27.9.2012.
In view of the above, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the present petition with liberty to the petitioner to take recourse to the alternative remedy available to him under law.
Dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid.
(NARESH KUMAR SANGHI) November 15, 2012 JUDGE Pkapoor
Rajesh
State of Haryana
another
NARESH KUMAR SANGHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
